The Bible was written over a span of years, by 40 writers. Unlike other religious writings, the Bible reads as a factual news account of real events, places, people, and dialogue. Historians and archaeologists have repeatedly confirmed its authenticity. Using the writers' own writing styles and personalities, God shows us who he is and what it's like to know him.
There is one central message consistently carried by all 40 writers of the Bible: God, who created us all, desires a relationship with us.
286. God Wrote a Book
He calls us to know him and trust him. The Bible not only inspires us, it explains life and God to us. It does not answer all the questions we might have, but enough of them. It shows us how to live with purpose and compassion. How to relate to others.
- A Quick Quiz: Black and White Films?
- Bestselling non-fiction book.
- God Wrote A Book - Church Campaign;
- Golden Eagle Hornpipe.
- See a Problem?!
It encourages us to rely on God for strength, direction, and enjoy his love for us. The Bible also tells us how we can have eternal life.
God Wrote a Book - THE DAILY PLATFORM
Multiple categories of evidence support the historical accuracy of the Bible as well as its claim to divine authorship. Here are a few reasons you can trust the Bible. Archaeologists have consistently discovered the names of government officials, kings, cities, and festivals mentioned in the Bible -- sometimes when historians didn't think such people or places existed. The text even describes the five porticoes walkways leading to the pool. Scholars didn't think the pool existed, until archaeologists found it forty feet below ground, complete with the five porticoes.
The Bible has a tremendous amount of historical detail, so not everything mentioned in it has yet been found through archaeology. However, not one archaeological find has conflicted with what the Bible records. In contrast, news reporter Lee Strobel comments about the Book of Mormon : "Archaeology has repeatedly failed to substantiate its claims about events that supposedly occurred long ago in the Americas.
I remember writing to the Smithsonian Institute to inquire about whether there was any evidence supporting the claims of Mormonism, only to be told in unequivocal terms that its archaeologists see 'no direct connection between the archaeology of the New World and the subject matter of the book.
Many of the ancient locations mentioned by Luke, in the Book of Acts in the New Testament, have been identified through archaeology. Archaeology has also refuted many ill-founded theories about the Bible. For example, a theory still taught in some colleges today asserts that Moses could not have written the Pentateuch the first five books of the Bible , because writing had not been invented in his day.
Then archaeologists discovered the Black Stele. Was it post-Moses? It was pre-Mosaic; not only that, but it was pre-Abraham 2, B. It preceded Moses' writings by at least three centuries. Click here to see a chart listing some of the major archaeological finds. Some people have the idea that the Bible has been translated "so many times" that it has become corrupted through stages of translating.
That would probably be true if the translations were being made from other translations. But translations are actually made directly from original Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic source texts based on thousands of ancient manuscripts. When comparing the manuscripts at hand with these, from 1, years earlier, we find agreement And the. So people hand copied originals, to maintain the message and circulate it to others. The earliest copies we have of it are dated A. There are only seven copies in existence. The copies we have today are dated 1, years after he wrote it. We have ten copies.
When it comes to the New Testament, written between A. D, there are more than 5, copies. All are within years of their original writing. Further, when it came to Scripture, scribes monks were meticulous in their copying of original manuscripts. They checked and rechecked their work, to make sure it perfectly matched. What the New Testament writers originally wrote is preserved better than any other ancient manuscript.
For a comparison of the New Testament to other ancient writings, click here. A comparison of the New Testament to other ancient writings Four of the writers of the New Testament each wrote their own biography on the life of Jesus. These are called the four gospels, the first four books of the New Testament.
When historians try to determine if a biography is reliable, they ask, "How many other sources report the same details about this person? Here's how this works. Imagine you are collecting biographies of President John F. You find many biographies describing his family, his presidency, his goal of putting a man on the moon, and his handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Regarding Jesus, do we find multiple biographies reporting similar facts about his life?
Here is a sampling of facts about Jesus, and where you would find that fact reported in each of their biographies. Two of the gospel biographies were written by the apostles Matthew and John, men who knew Jesus personally and traveled with him for over three years. The other two books were written by Mark and Luke, close associates of the apostles. These writers had direct access to the facts they were recording. At the time of their writing, there were still people alive who had heard Jesus speak, watched him heal people and perform miracles.
So the early church readily accepted the four gospels because they agreed with what was already common knowledge about Jesus' life. Each of the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, read like news reports, a factual accounting of the days events, each from their own perspective. The descriptions are unique to each writer, but the facts are in agreement. For a sample from one of the Gospels, click here. The Gospels are presented as matter-of-fact, "this is how it was.
One typical example is the account in Luke, chapter 8, where Jesus brings a little girl back to life. Notice the details and clarity in its reporting:. Then a man named Jairus, a ruler of the synagogue, came and fell at Jesus' feet, pleading with him to come to his house because his only daughter, a girl of about twelve, was dying. As Jesus was on his way, the crowds almost crushed him. And a woman was there who had been subject to bleeding for twelve years, but no one could heal her. She came up behind him and touched the edge of his cloak, and immediately her bleeding stopped.
When they all denied it, Peter said, "Master, the people are crowding and pressing against you. Then the woman, seeing that she could not go unnoticed, came trembling and fell at his feet. In the presence of all the people, she told why she had touched him and how she had been instantly healed. Then he said to her, "Daughter, your faith has healed you.
Go in peace. While Jesus was still speaking, someone came from the house of Jairus, the synagogue ruler.
When he arrived at the house of Jairus, he did not let anyone go in with him except Peter, John and James, and the child's father and mother. Meanwhile, all the people were wailing and mourning for her.
But he took her by the hand and said, "My child, get up! Then Jesus told them to give her something to eat. Her parents were astonished, but he ordered them not to tell anyone what had happened. Like other accounts of Jesus' healing people, this has a ring of authenticity. If it were fiction, there are portions of it that would have been written differently. For example, in a fictional account there wouldn't be an interruption with something else happening.
If it were fiction, the people in mourning would not have laughed at Jesus' statement; get angry maybe, be hurt by it, but not laugh. And in writing fiction, would Jesus have ordered the parents to be quiet about it? You would expect the healing to make a grand point. But real life isn't always smooth.
There are interruptions. People do react oddly. And Jesus had his own reasons for not wanting the parents to broadcast this.